Commit Graph

41 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dependabot[bot]
42af5002a2 Bump tailwindcss from 4.1.17 to 4.1.18
Bumps [tailwindcss](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/tree/HEAD/packages/tailwindcss) from 4.1.17 to 4.1.18.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/commits/v4.1.18/packages/tailwindcss)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: tailwindcss
  dependency-version: 4.1.18
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
2026-01-22 15:43:45 +00:00
e7de95c695 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 15:33:51 +00:00
b6d3fffb4a Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 15:23:48 +00:00
7a1d74b272 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 15:14:02 +00:00
06c30f56f9 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 15:07:58 +00:00
17df8f70db Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 14:54:01 +00:00
4a7ee4cf96 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ProductRoadmap.tsx, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box or two, thats about it. 2026-01-22 14:45:18 +00:00
92cd58de0b Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP, dont edit roadmap file, you can edit it to tick a box, thats about it. 2026-01-22 14:38:35 +00:00
8df5864750 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP, dont edit roadmap file 2026-01-22 14:34:05 +00:00
c6241732ef Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP, dont edit roadmap file 2026-01-22 14:28:10 +00:00
f5efbef9bb Generated by Spark: menu can have folding 2026-01-18 22:29:57 +00:00
7b9a7336e4 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 22:28:11 +00:00
77ffbb3e10 Generated by Spark: I think menu flow needs redesigning 2026-01-18 22:15:57 +00:00
53a29cec2d Edited Spark 2026-01-18 22:13:29 +00:00
d0f1350ffd Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 22:12:59 +00:00
a8823ef669 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 22:07:16 +00:00
70f5c51af5 Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 22:04:22 +00:00
063c088d35 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 22:00:00 +00:00
3c8e50de96 Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 21:55:30 +00:00
0934ed496c Edited Spark 2026-01-18 21:54:17 +00:00
63cd3308cd Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 21:40:57 +00:00
00a6b01da1 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 21:38:15 +00:00
62685bd584 Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 21:36:56 +00:00
b460691032 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 21:35:46 +00:00
31116a67d0 Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 21:35:20 +00:00
b54146ddc2 Edited Spark 2026-01-18 21:33:24 +00:00
c5fc4717f8 Add spark configuration 2026-01-18 21:32:38 +00:00
1feea7106a Generated by Spark: great, implement stuff from product roadmap 2026-01-18 21:32:23 +00:00
b48d4d178a Generated by Spark: PLEASE FORCE THIS THROUGH, DONT UPDATE EXISTING ROADMAP TAB, MAKE A ROADMAP 2 tab with checkboxes. We need a tab for actual StrategyOS Roadmap, as its not clear what we need to do product development wise - 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot.Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives
2026-01-18 21:28:09 +00:00
0699e5bcd1 Generated by Spark: PLEASE FORCE THIS THROUGH, DONT UPDATE EXISTING ROADMAP TAB. We need a tab for actual StrategyOS Roadmap, as its not clear what we need to do product development wise - 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot.Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives
2026-01-18 21:25:01 +00:00
7cd3c1e926 Generated by Spark: We need a tab for actual StrategyOS Roadmap, as its not clear what we need to do product development wise - 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot.Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives
2026-01-18 21:23:56 +00:00
5eb9c2145b Generated by Spark: We need a tab for actual StrategyOS Roadmap, it could be seed data - 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot.Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives
2026-01-18 21:20:35 +00:00
7615a9476d Generated by Spark: Our product got wiped off roadmap, it could be seed data - 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot.Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives
2026-01-18 21:16:10 +00:00
0227e2cf41 Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP 2026-01-18 21:14:09 +00:00
c9e667017d Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP 2026-01-18 21:08:18 +00:00
cdcb81aa4c Generated by Spark: Ok implement new features from ROADMAP 2026-01-18 21:03:39 +00:00
bd1a0aa8b0 Generated by Spark: Roadmap should have projects, i guess projects can have metrics and objectives 2026-01-18 20:58:48 +00:00
0c536d1cb2 Generated by Spark: Roadmap should have Metrics, Objectives, Bowling Chart, Dashboard, X-Matrix and any other concepts we forgot. 2026-01-18 20:54:45 +00:00
748625c31a Generated by Spark: Add a ROADMAP.md tab - infer content from this: 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives
2026-01-18 20:49:32 +00:00
d0072d0e4a Generated by Spark: 1. Product Scope & Positioning
1.1 Product Portfolio

The product suite SHALL consist of two tightly integrated products:

Strategy Cards — strategy creation and alignment

Workbench — strategy execution, tracking, and governance

Each product MUST be independently usable but deliver maximum value when combined.

2. Core Product Outcomes
2.1 Primary Outcomes

The system MUST enable organizations to:

Create clear, shared strategic intent

Translate strategy into executable initiatives

Track progress against goals in real time

Maintain a single authoritative view of strategy execution

2.2 Target Users

The product MUST support:

Executives and senior leaders

Strategy offices / PMOs

Operational excellence teams

Portfolio and program managers

Project owners and contributors

3. Strategy Cards — Design Criteria
3.1 Strategy Creation

Strategy Cards MUST:

Support structured strategy creation using proven frameworks

Enable exploration, comparison, and refinement of strategic options

Reduce reliance on slides, spreadsheets, and ad-hoc documents

3.2 Alignment & Collaboration

Strategy Cards MUST:

Enable collaborative workshops and facilitated discussions

Promote shared understanding across teams

Capture rationale, assumptions, and decisions

3.3 Usability & Speed

Strategy Cards MUST:

Minimize time spent on blank or unstructured work

Guide users step-by-step through strategy formulation

Enable rapid iteration and refinement

4. Workbench — Design Criteria
4.1 Strategy Execution

Workbench MUST:

Translate strategic objectives into initiatives, projects, and actions

Link strategy directly to delivery mechanisms

Support execution methodologies including:

Strategic Portfolio Management

Hoshin Kanri

Operational Excellence

OKRs

4.2 Tracking & Measurement

Workbench MUST:

Provide real-time tracking of initiatives and projects

Support KPI, metric, and scorecard management

Enable visibility from enterprise level down to individual ownership

4.3 Governance & Accountability

Workbench MUST:

Clearly define ownership and accountability

Support portfolio-level governance and prioritization

Enable decision-making based on impact, capacity, and alignment

5. Cross-Product System Capabilities
5.1 Single Source of Truth

The system MUST:

Centralize all strategy, execution, metrics, and reporting

Eliminate fragmented tools and duplicate data

Provide one undisputed, authoritative view of progress

5.2 Traceability

The system MUST provide end-to-end traceability between:

Strategic goals

Initiatives and projects

KPIs and financial outcomes

Individual and team objectives

6. Portfolio Management Criteria
6.1 Portfolio Structuring

The system MUST:

Support grouping of initiatives into strategic portfolios

Allow portfolios to reflect business-specific structures

Support domains such as:

M&A

Operational Excellence

Financial Transformation

ESG

Private Equity portfolios

6.2 Portfolio Analysis

The system MUST enable:

Alignment and impact assessment

Capacity and demand balancing

Dependency and delivery risk analysis

Funding and resource evaluation

7. Integration & Extensibility
7.1 External Systems

The platform MUST integrate with:

Project management tools

ERP systems

CRM systems

Other enterprise data sources

7.2 Configurability

The system MUST:

Adapt to organizational language, processes, and structures

Support multiple regions, languages, and operating models

Avoid forcing rigid or prescriptive workflows

8. Operational Excellence & Continuous Improvement
8.1 Process Enablement

The system MUST:

Support Lean, Hoshin Kanri, and continuous improvement methods

Enable consistent reporting across units and regions

Encourage countermeasure-driven improvement, not just KPI reporting

8.2 Automation

The system MUST:

Automate manual reporting and reconciliation

Reduce time spent maintaining spreadsheets

Free users to focus on execution and improvement

9. Reporting & Visibility
9.1 Reporting Capabilities

The system MUST provide:

Portfolio-level dashboards

Scorecards with consistent definitions

Drill-down from enterprise to project level

Real-time status visibility

9.2 Financial Visibility

The system MUST:

Link improvement activity to financial outcomes

Provide shared visibility between Operations and Finance

Support savings tracking and value realization

10. Non-Functional Design Criteria
10.1 Usability

Intuitive for non-technical users

Minimal training required for core workflows

Clear visual models of strategy and execution

10.2 Scalability

Support global organizations

Scale across portfolios, regions, and users

Maintain performance with large datasets

10.3 Reliability

High availability for executive-critical reporting

Data integrity across integrated systems

11. Success Criteria

The product SHALL be considered successful if it:

Replaces spreadsheet-based strategy execution

Improves alignment across teams and functions

Increases execution confidence for leadership

Demonstrably improves delivery of strategic initiatives
2026-01-18 20:46:28 +00:00
219ddf5438 Initial commit 2026-01-18 20:40:18 +00:00