mirror of
https://github.com/johndoe6345789/metabuilder.git
synced 2026-04-25 22:34:56 +00:00
- Created TODO files for Testing, DBAL, Frontend, Packages, Database, and Lua Scripting. - Updated README with a quick reference table for all TODO files and their priorities. - Added specific tasks for improving testing coverage, implementing DBAL features, enhancing frontend components, and refining package management. - Included documentation tasks to ensure thorough coverage and clarity across all areas. - Implemented initial unit tests for the useAuth hook and improved password generation logic. - Enhanced package loader functionality to support modular package seed data retrieval. - Updated page renderer to include public role in permission checks. - Added comments for future unit tests in workflow engine and other critical areas.
453 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
453 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
# GitHub Workflows Documentation
|
|
|
|
This directory contains automated workflows for CI/CD, code quality, and comprehensive AI-assisted development throughout the entire SDLC.
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 GitHub Copilot Integration
|
|
|
|
All workflows are designed to work seamlessly with **GitHub Copilot** to assist throughout the Software Development Lifecycle:
|
|
|
|
- **Planning Phase**: Architecture review, PRD alignment, implementation guidance
|
|
- **Development Phase**: Continuous quality feedback, code suggestions, refactoring opportunities
|
|
- **Testing Phase**: Automated code review, security checks, quality validation
|
|
- **Deployment Phase**: Pre-deployment validation, health checks, monitoring
|
|
- **Maintenance Phase**: Issue triage, automated fixes, dependency management
|
|
|
|
**📖 Copilot Instructions:** [.github/copilot-instructions.md](../copilot-instructions.md)
|
|
|
|
## Workflows Overview
|
|
|
|
### 1. CI/CD Workflow (`ci.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** Push to main/master/develop branches, Pull requests
|
|
|
|
**Jobs:**
|
|
- **Prisma Check**: Validates database schema and generates Prisma client
|
|
- **Lint**: Runs ESLint to check code quality
|
|
- **Build**: Builds the application and uploads artifacts
|
|
- **E2E Tests**: Runs Playwright end-to-end tests
|
|
- **Quality Check**: Checks for console.log statements and TODO comments
|
|
|
|
### 2. Automated Code Review (`code-review.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** Pull request opened, synchronized, or reopened
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Analyzes code changes for security issues (eval, innerHTML, XSS risks)
|
|
- Checks for code quality issues (console.log, debugger, any types)
|
|
- Provides suggestions for improvements
|
|
- **Auto-approves PRs** if no blocking issues are found
|
|
- Adds appropriate labels (needs-changes, ready-for-review, has-warnings)
|
|
|
|
**Review Criteria:**
|
|
- ✅ Security vulnerabilities
|
|
- ✅ Code quality issues
|
|
- ✅ Type safety
|
|
- ✅ React best practices
|
|
- ✅ File size warnings
|
|
|
|
### 3. Auto Merge (`auto-merge.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** PR approval, CI workflow completion
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Automatically merges PRs when:
|
|
- PR is approved by reviewers
|
|
- All CI checks pass (lint, build, e2e tests)
|
|
- No merge conflicts
|
|
- PR is not in draft
|
|
- **Automatically deletes the branch** after successful merge
|
|
- Uses squash merge strategy
|
|
- Posts comments about merge status
|
|
|
|
### 4. Issue Triage (`issue-triage.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** New issues opened, issues labeled
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Automatically categorizes and labels issues:
|
|
- Type: bug, enhancement, documentation, testing, security, performance
|
|
- Priority: high, medium, low
|
|
- AI-fixable flag for automated fixes
|
|
- Posts welcome message with issue summary
|
|
- Suggests automated fix attempts for simple issues
|
|
- Can create fix branches automatically with `create-pr` label
|
|
|
|
### 5. PR Management (`pr-management.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** PR opened, synchronized, labeled
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Auto-labels PRs based on changed files:
|
|
- workflows, tests, documentation, ui, styling, configuration, dependencies
|
|
- Size labels (small/medium/large)
|
|
- Type labels from PR title (bug, enhancement, refactor, etc.)
|
|
- Validates PR descriptions
|
|
- Links related issues automatically
|
|
- Posts comments on related issues
|
|
|
|
### 6. Merge Conflict Check (`merge-conflict-check.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** PR opened/synchronized, push to main/master
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Detects merge conflicts
|
|
- Posts comment mentioning @copilot to resolve
|
|
- Adds/removes `merge-conflict` label
|
|
- Fails CI if conflicts exist
|
|
|
|
### 7. Planning & Design (`planning.yml`) 🆕
|
|
**Triggered on:** Issues opened or labeled with enhancement/feature-request
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- **Architecture Review**: Analyzes feature requests against architectural principles
|
|
- **PRD Alignment Check**: Ensures new features align with project mission
|
|
- **Implementation Suggestions**: Provides step-by-step implementation guidance
|
|
- Validates declarative-first approach
|
|
- Checks multi-tenant and permission considerations
|
|
- Creates design checklists for feature implementation
|
|
- **@copilot integration** for architecture guidance
|
|
|
|
**SDLC Phase:** Planning & Design
|
|
|
|
### 8. Development Assistance (`development.yml`) 🆕
|
|
**Triggered on:** Push to feature branches, PR updates, @copilot mentions
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- **Continuous Quality Feedback**: Real-time code metrics and architectural compliance
|
|
- **Declarative Ratio Tracking**: Monitors JSON/Lua vs TypeScript balance
|
|
- **Component Size Monitoring**: Flags components exceeding 150 LOC
|
|
- **Refactoring Suggestions**: Identifies opportunities for improvement
|
|
- **@copilot Interaction Handler**: Responds to @copilot mentions with context-aware guidance
|
|
- Provides architectural reminders and best practices
|
|
- Suggests generic renderers over hardcoded components
|
|
|
|
**SDLC Phase:** Development
|
|
|
|
### 9. Deployment & Monitoring (`deployment.yml`) 🆕
|
|
**Triggered on:** Push to main, releases, manual workflow dispatch
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- **Pre-Deployment Validation**: Schema validation, security audit, package size check
|
|
- **Breaking Change Detection**: Identifies breaking commits
|
|
- **Deployment Summary**: Generates release notes with categorized changes
|
|
- **Post-Deployment Health Checks**: Verifies build integrity and critical files
|
|
- **Deployment Tracking Issues**: Creates monitoring issues for releases
|
|
- **Security Dependency Audit**: Detects and reports vulnerabilities
|
|
- Auto-creates security issues for critical vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
**SDLC Phase:** Deployment & Operations
|
|
|
|
### 10. Code Size Limits (`size-limits.yml`)
|
|
**Triggered on:** Pull requests, pushes to main (when source files change)
|
|
|
|
**Features:**
|
|
- Enforces file size limits and posts PR comments on violations
|
|
- Uploads a size report artifact
|
|
- Monitors `frontends/nextjs/src/**` and runs `scripts/enforce-size-limits.ts` from `frontends/nextjs`
|
|
|
|
## SDLC Coverage
|
|
|
|
### 🎯 Complete Lifecycle Support
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Planning │ ← planning.yml (Architecture Review, PRD Check)
|
|
└──────┬──────┘
|
|
↓
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Development │ ← development.yml (Quality Feedback, Refactoring)
|
|
└──────┬──────┘
|
|
↓
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Testing │ ← ci.yml, code-review.yml (Lint, Build, E2E)
|
|
└──────┬──────┘
|
|
↓
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Integration │ ← pr-management.yml, auto-merge.yml
|
|
└──────┬──────┘
|
|
↓
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Deployment │ ← deployment.yml (Validation, Health Checks)
|
|
└──────┬──────┘
|
|
↓
|
|
┌─────────────┐
|
|
│ Maintenance │ ← issue-triage.yml, dependabot.yml
|
|
└─────────────┘
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Labels Used
|
|
|
|
### Automated Labels
|
|
- `bug` - Bug fixes
|
|
- `enhancement` - New features
|
|
- `feature-request` - Proposed new features
|
|
- `ready-to-implement` - Features ready for development
|
|
- `documentation` - Documentation changes
|
|
- `tests` - Test-related changes
|
|
- `security` - Security issues
|
|
- `performance` - Performance improvements
|
|
- `needs-changes` - PR requires changes
|
|
- `ready-for-review` - PR is ready for review
|
|
- `has-warnings` - PR has warnings to address
|
|
- `large-pr` - PR with many changes
|
|
- `size: small/medium/large` - PR size indicators
|
|
- `ai-fixable` - Issues that can be auto-fixed
|
|
- `good first issue` - Good for newcomers
|
|
- `priority: high/medium/low` - Issue priority
|
|
- `merge-conflict` - PR has merge conflicts
|
|
- `auto-fix` - Request automated fix
|
|
- `create-pr` - Create fix PR for issue
|
|
- `deployment` - Deployment tracking
|
|
- `monitoring` - Monitoring and observability
|
|
- `dependencies` - Dependency updates
|
|
- `refactor` - Code refactoring
|
|
- `chore` - Maintenance tasks
|
|
- `workflows` - Workflow changes
|
|
- `ui` - UI/UX changes
|
|
- `styling` - CSS/Tailwind changes
|
|
- `configuration` - Config file changes
|
|
|
|
## Configuration
|
|
|
|
### ESLint
|
|
The project uses ESLint with TypeScript support and React-specific rules:
|
|
- File: `eslint.config.js`
|
|
- Strict type checking (warnings for gradual adoption)
|
|
- React hooks validation
|
|
- Code quality rules
|
|
|
|
### Playwright E2E Tests
|
|
- Configuration: `playwright.config.ts`
|
|
- Tests directory: `e2e/`
|
|
- Runs on Chromium browser
|
|
- Tests include:
|
|
- Login functionality
|
|
- Navigation
|
|
- CRUD operations
|
|
- Form interactions
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
### Working with GitHub Copilot
|
|
|
|
**In Issues:**
|
|
```markdown
|
|
@copilot implement this issue
|
|
@copilot review the architecture
|
|
@copilot suggest testing strategy
|
|
@copilot help with this
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**In Pull Requests:**
|
|
- Automated feedback on every push
|
|
- Continuous quality metrics
|
|
- Refactoring suggestions
|
|
- Architectural compliance checks
|
|
|
|
**In Your IDE:**
|
|
- Reference `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for context
|
|
- Use docs/getting-started/PRD.md for feature context
|
|
- Follow existing patterns in `/packages/`
|
|
- Ask Copilot about architectural decisions
|
|
|
|
### Testing Workflows Locally with Act
|
|
|
|
Before pushing to GitHub, test workflows locally using [act](https://github.com/nektos/act):
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Quick diagnostics (no act required)
|
|
./scripts/diagnose-workflows.sh
|
|
|
|
# Interactive workflow testing
|
|
./scripts/test-workflows.sh
|
|
|
|
# Or use act directly
|
|
act -l # List all workflows
|
|
act push # Run CI pipeline
|
|
act -j lint # Test linting job
|
|
act -j build # Test build job
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**📖 See [ACT_TESTING.md](../../docs/ACT_TESTING.md) for comprehensive act testing guide**
|
|
|
|
### Running Locally
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Run linter
|
|
npm run lint
|
|
|
|
# Fix linting issues automatically
|
|
npm run lint:fix
|
|
|
|
# Run e2e tests
|
|
npm run test:e2e
|
|
|
|
# Run e2e tests with UI
|
|
npm run test:e2e:ui
|
|
|
|
# Run e2e tests in headed mode
|
|
npm run test:e2e:headed
|
|
|
|
# Build the project
|
|
npm run build
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Triggering Workflows
|
|
|
|
**Planning Phase:**
|
|
1. Create issue with `enhancement` or `feature-request` label
|
|
2. Automated architecture review and PRD alignment check
|
|
3. Add `ready-to-implement` label for implementation guidance
|
|
4. Follow suggested step-by-step plan
|
|
|
|
**Development Phase:**
|
|
1. Create feature branch: `git checkout -b feature/issue-X`
|
|
2. Push changes - triggers continuous quality feedback
|
|
3. Get real-time metrics on declarative ratio, component sizes
|
|
4. Mention `@copilot` in commits/PRs for specific help
|
|
5. Review refactoring suggestions
|
|
|
|
**Testing & Review Phase:**
|
|
1. Open PR - automatically reviewed, labeled, and validated
|
|
2. Address any architectural compliance issues
|
|
3. Get approval + pass tests
|
|
4. Automatically merged and branch deleted
|
|
|
|
**Deployment Phase:**
|
|
1. Merge to main - triggers pre-deployment validation
|
|
2. Create release - generates deployment notes and tracking issue
|
|
3. Post-deployment health checks run automatically
|
|
4. Monitor deployment tracking issue for 48 hours
|
|
|
|
**Maintenance Phase:**
|
|
1. Security audits run on every deployment
|
|
2. Dependabot creates automated dependency PRs
|
|
3. Issue triage handles new bug reports
|
|
4. @copilot assists with fixes and improvements
|
|
|
|
### For Issues:
|
|
1. Create an issue - automatically triaged and labeled
|
|
2. Add `enhancement` label - triggers architecture review
|
|
3. Add `ready-to-implement` label - get implementation guidance
|
|
4. Add `auto-fix` label to request automated fix
|
|
5. Add `create-pr` label to create a fix branch
|
|
6. Mention `@copilot` for specific assistance
|
|
|
|
**For PRs:**
|
|
1. Open a PR - automatically reviewed, labeled, and validated
|
|
2. Push changes - triggers CI/CD pipeline and quality feedback
|
|
3. Get approval + pass tests - automatically merged and branch deleted
|
|
4. Receive continuous refactoring suggestions
|
|
|
|
### Working with AI Assistance
|
|
|
|
**In Issues & PRs:**
|
|
- Mention `@copilot implement this` - Get implementation guidance
|
|
- Mention `@copilot review` - Request code review
|
|
- Mention `@copilot architecture` - Get architectural guidance
|
|
- Mention `@copilot test` - Get testing help
|
|
- Mention `@copilot fix this issue` - Request automated fix
|
|
|
|
**In Your IDE:**
|
|
- Use GitHub Copilot extension with context from `.github/copilot-instructions.md`
|
|
- Reference docs/getting-started/PRD.md when prompting for features
|
|
- Follow patterns from existing packages
|
|
- Ask about architectural decisions before implementing
|
|
|
|
**Automated Copilot Features:**
|
|
- Architecture review on feature requests
|
|
- Continuous quality feedback during development
|
|
- Refactoring opportunity detection
|
|
- PRD alignment checking
|
|
- Implementation step-by-step guidance
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### For Development
|
|
1. **Follow declarative-first principles** - Prefer JSON + Lua over TypeScript
|
|
2. **Keep components under 150 LOC** - Break large files into smaller ones
|
|
3. **Use generic renderers** - Avoid hardcoded component TSX files
|
|
4. **Store config in database** - Use Prisma, not hardcoded values
|
|
5. **Organize as packages** - Self-contained features with seed data
|
|
|
|
### For Pull Requests
|
|
|
|
### For Pull Requests
|
|
1. **Write descriptive PR titles** - Used for automatic labeling
|
|
2. **Link issues in PR descriptions** - Enables automatic issue closing
|
|
3. **Keep PRs focused and small** - Easier to review and merge
|
|
4. **Address all review comments** - Even warnings should be considered
|
|
5. **Test locally before pushing** - Run lint and tests
|
|
6. **Don't commit console.log statements** - Will be flagged in review
|
|
7. **Remove debugger statements** - Treated as blocking issues
|
|
8. **Review refactoring suggestions** - Continuous improvement opportunities
|
|
|
|
### For Issues
|
|
1. **Use clear, descriptive titles** - Helps with automatic categorization
|
|
2. **Provide context** - Link to docs/getting-started/PRD.md sections, mention permission levels
|
|
3. **Consider architecture** - Is this declarative? Package-worthy? Multi-tenant?
|
|
4. **Use labels appropriately** - Triggers relevant workflow automation
|
|
5. **Engage with @copilot** - Get AI assistance throughout implementation
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
### Running Act to Find Workflow Issues
|
|
|
|
Use act to test workflows locally and identify issues before pushing:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Run full diagnostics
|
|
./scripts/diagnose-workflows.sh
|
|
|
|
# Test specific failing job
|
|
act -j <job-name> -v
|
|
|
|
# Test entire CI pipeline
|
|
./scripts/test-workflows.sh
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**📖 Complete guide:** [ACT_TESTING.md](../../docs/ACT_TESTING.md)
|
|
|
|
### PR Not Auto-Merging
|
|
- Check that all CI checks passed
|
|
- Verify PR has approval
|
|
- Ensure no merge conflicts
|
|
- Confirm PR is not in draft mode
|
|
|
|
### Tests Failing
|
|
- Run tests locally: `npm run test:e2e`
|
|
- Check test report artifacts in GitHub Actions
|
|
- Ensure dev server starts correctly
|
|
- Test with act: `act -j test-e2e`
|
|
|
|
### Linting Errors
|
|
- Run `npm run lint:fix` to auto-fix
|
|
- Review errors: `npm run lint`
|
|
- Check `eslint.config.js` for rule configuration
|
|
- Test with act: `act -j lint`
|
|
|
|
### Build Failures
|
|
- Test locally: `npm run build`
|
|
- Check for TypeScript errors
|
|
- Verify all dependencies are installed
|
|
- Test with act: `act -j build`
|
|
|
|
### Prisma Issues
|
|
- Ensure schema exists: `prisma/schema.prisma`
|
|
- Generate client: `npx prisma generate`
|
|
- Run migrations: `npx prisma migrate dev`
|
|
- Test with act: `act -j prisma-check`
|
|
|
|
## Contributing
|
|
|
|
When adding new workflows:
|
|
1. Document the workflow in this README
|
|
2. Add appropriate error handling
|
|
3. Test the workflow on a test branch
|
|
4. Ensure proper permissions are set
|
|
5. Add labels if needed (they'll be created automatically)
|
|
|
|
## Security
|
|
|
|
Workflows use `GITHUB_TOKEN` with minimal required permissions:
|
|
- `contents: read/write` - For reading code and merging PRs
|
|
- `pull-requests: write` - For commenting and managing PRs
|
|
- `issues: write` - For managing issues
|
|
- `checks: read` - For reading CI status
|
|
|
|
No secrets are required for basic functionality.
|